005 Objective Type Test on Indian Constitution




1.
Indian Constitution Objective Type Question: Art. 226 provides for writ jurisdiction of
Supreme Court High Court Trial Court a and b

2.What type of writ petition a person can file, if a relative is missing and there is a suspicion that he is under secret custody of police:
Habeas corpus Mandamus Quo Warranto Certiorari

3.Who has the temporary authority to suspend the Fundamental Rights:
Parliament President Supreme Court Prime Minister

4.What is the importance of Article 18(4):
Right to freedom Right to life Padma Awards are not titles Right to Education

5.Article 300A recognises the Right to
Education Life Property Religious freedom

6.Right to Life is inspired by the Constitution of
France Japan Britain United States

7.Article 32 helps a citizen whose Fundamental Rights were threatened, to file a writ petition before:
District Court High Court Supreme Court b and c

8.Which provisions cannot be enforced through Courts?:
Directive Principles Fundamental Rights Delegated Law NOT

9.Who said that Fundamental Rights represented the Conscience of the Constitution? :
Mahatma Gandhi Jawaharlal Nehru B.R. Ambedkar Maulana Azad

10.Endless reservations on various grounds threaten which Article of the Constitution?
14 19 21 32

11.Whose role has become significant as the Guardian of Fundamental Rights?
President Parliament Cabinet High Courts and Supreme Courts

12.Art. 20(2) provides some protection against
wrongful prosecution double jeopardy wrongful confinement illegal searches

13.What is the Basic Structure of Indian Constitution?
Fundamental Rights Directive Principles Fundamental Duties No defintion

14.States have jurisdiction to legislate on
Fundamental Rights Directive Principles Jurisdiction of Courts NOT

15.Compulsory Primary Education is covered by the Article
14 19 21 226

16.The significance of Art. 356 is :
Imposition of Emergency President's Rule in States Common Civil Code Right to Property

17.PIL (Public Interest Litigation) is covered by the Article
14 19 21 NOT

18.Who prepares the first list of candidates for appointment as Judges of Supreme Court?
President Prime Minister Cabinet Collegium of Supreme Court Judges

19.Who can suspend High Court Judges?
CJI President Collegium of Supreme Court Judges Only through impeachment

20.Who can prosecute High Court Judges for private offenses?
Supreme Court High Court Chief Justice President There is confusion

.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9 Prevention of Miscarriages

Image
Prevention of Miscarriages 9 High Courts and Supreme Courts ought to aim to prevent injustice. What is the use of post mortem? Topics for discussion: Miscarriage of Justice, High Courts, Supreme Court, Constitution, A.P. Bifurcation With due respect to the Supreme Court of India and the State High Courts in India, I am anguished to express my feelings as under: Supreme Court and High Courts seem inclined to intervene only after an injustice takes place and refuse to intervene if the petitioners approach in advance. Prevention of injustice, rather than some artificial correction after miscarriage of justice, ought to be the objective of a truly responsive Justice System. Philosophy of Justice expects that courts have to intervene, when applicants approach ahead of the actual happening of injustice, if there are indications of the injustice taking place, prima facie. Andhra Pradesh Bifurcation Bill serves as the best example of miscarriage of justice owing to refusal of High ...
Read more

011 Justice should not only be done, but also should appear to have been done!

Image
Photos courtesy http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/judges/sjud/hldattu.htm    http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/judges/sjud/kjoseph.htm Readers can also see the biodata of the Hon. Justices at the above links. Context This is in continuation of my post No. 010 at this blog:  http://indianlawyb.blogspot.in/search/label/010 Hon. Justice Joseph expressed his inability to attend a dinner-cum-Conference of CMs and Justices hosted by Prime Minister of India, as it was held on Easter Day. Justice Joseph has also raised some pertinent questions about future of Secularism in India, and also the particular act of holding the Conference on a day of Religious Importance. "...I may with deep anguish bring to your kind notice that such an important conference shouldn't have been held when some of us, who are otherwise expected to be part of the event, are otherwise committed on account of the holy days when we have religious ceremonies and family get- toge...
Read more

004 Why should Junior Advocates be made scapegoats?

Image
WHY BLAME A JUNIOR ADVOCATE? NEWS HEADLINE : "SC PULLS UP MAHINDRA SATYAM FOR 'ARROGANCE' " The SC here refers to the Supreme Court of India. Pulling up refers to the Supreme Court censuring the Company "Mahindra Satyam". Brief Details : A dispute between the Company 'Mahindra Satyam' and the Income Tax Authorities regarding the earlier order of the Income Tax Department demanding a tax of Rupees 6170 million (617 crore). The Income Tax Authorities seem to be re-examining their demand of Rs. 6170 million and probably trying to reduce it. A letter addressed by the Company to the Income Tax Authorities asking them to withdraw their demand, has been interprted by the Attorney General Mr. G.E. Vahanavati as highly offensive. A three-judge-bench headed by the Chief Justice of India remarked : "You cannot do this in such manner. Instruct them (Satyam) to withdraw the letter. This is not the way." The Bench seems to...
Read more