INDIAN LAW YB

Prevention of Miscarriages 9 High Courts and Supreme Courts ought to aim to prevent injustice. What is the use of post mortem? Topics for discussion: Miscarriage of Justice, High Courts, Supreme Court, Constitution, A.P. Bifurcation With due respect to the Supreme Court of India and the State High Courts in India, I am anguished to express my feelings as under: Supreme Court and High Courts seem inclined to intervene only after an injustice takes place and refuse to intervene if the petitioners approach in advance. Prevention of injustice, rather than some artificial correction after miscarriage of justice, ought to be the objective of a truly responsive Justice System. Philosophy of Justice expects that courts have to intervene, when applicants approach ahead of the actual happening of injustice, if there are indications of the injustice taking place, prima facie. Andhra Pradesh Bifurcation Bill serves as the best example of miscarriage of justice owing to refusal of High ...

1. Indian Constitution Objective Type Question: Art. 226 provides for writ jurisdiction of Supreme Court High Court Trial Court a and b 2.What type of writ petition a person can file, if a relative is missing and there is a suspicion that he is under secret custody of police: Habeas corpus Mandamus Quo Warranto Certiorari 3.Who has the temporary authority to suspend the Fundamental Rights: Parliament President Supreme Court Prime Minister 4.What is the importance of Article 18(4): Right to freedom Right to life Padma Awards are not titles Right to Education 5.Article 300A recognises the Right to Education Life Property Religious freedom 6.Right to Life is inspired by the Constitution of France Japan Britain United States 7.Article 32 helps a citizen whose Fundamental Rights were threatened, to file a writ petition before: District Court High Court Supreme Court b and c 8.Which provisions cannot be enforced through Courts?: Directive Principles Fu...