015, #015 How only Landed Caste Advocates get appointed as High Court Judges in Telugu States?


TODAY'S highlights:

  1. IS THERE RESERVATION FOR LANDED CASTES IN INDIAN JUDICIARY?

  2. Clarification: I am aged 70. I have no personal interest in writing this essay of analyses/review. I am not in a queue to be appointed as judge of any Court . In a way, I am writing these blog posts, even at the cost of incurring the wrath-s of Courts.

  3. Aged persons have already become 'disposables' in the context of Covid-19. Hence, going to jail by writing truths, may probably result in some personal hardships in jail; but then what is the use of living like a 'disposable oldman who has no right even to cough' ? Therefore , I appeal to every person who reads my blog posts, not to get hurt. I have no malice against any individual. Whatever I write, I write as an atheist and Marxist. It is not that atheists and Marxists can throw stones on others. Nobody can throw stones on others whether Atheists-Marxists or not.

  4. Besides, my blogs nobody reads. My blogs are to me, like gasket release levers or safety valves of pressure cookers, to release some steam, to prevent explosions.

  5. According to News Reports Mr. Boppudi Krishna Mohan, Ms. K. Lalitha Kumari, and Mr. K. Suresh Reddy have been recommended by Supreme Court Collegium, to be appointed as Judges of Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati .

  6. It is also reported that the Collegium approved the proposal for elevation of advocate B Vijaysen Reddy as a Judge of the Telangana High Court, Hyderabad.

  7. It is also reported that : CJI Bobde, Justices N V Ramana, Arun Mishra, R F Nariman and R Banumathi are the Collegium Members.

  8. So far so good. Every well-wisher of democracy in India supports the idea of a strong and independent Judiciary as a sine qua non for the success of "a Government of the people, by the people, for the people." I am not sure whether Abraham Lincoln the American President to whom this quote is attributed also dreamt of the Independence of Judiciary.

  9. It, probably, be in the interest of the Independence of Judiciary that the Collegium of Supreme Court Judges decides on the appointment of High Court and Supreme Court Judges .

  10. Supreme Court, has also invalidated a National Judicial Commission Law made by Indian Parliament which has tried to create an institutional mechanism for appointment of Judges to higher Judiciary .

  11. This self-assertion took place when the Central Executive (Which is Ruling Party and which Prime Minister is immaterial) desperately wanted to make the Supreme Court Judges malleable, pliable, and dancing to the Ruling Party 's tunes.

  12. "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men...", thus observed John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, a 19th Century British Historian.

  13. This wise saying can apply not only to Bureaucrats and politicians , but also to Judges , howsoever unbiased and wise they may be .

  14. Biases may take place unintentionally .

  15. INSTANT CASE

    Out of the four Judges appointed for the Telugu-Speaking States, two Judges are said to belong to Kamma caste, and two Judges are said to belong to Reddy caste. Both the castes are top landed castes of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana .

  16. Shri Boppudi Krishna Mohan --Kamma caste [also called Choudary caste]. Smt. K. Lalitha Kumari -aka- Lalitha --Kamma caste [also called Choudary caste]. Shri K. Suresh Reddy --Reddy Caste.

  17. [Telangana High Court] Shri B. Vijayasen Reddy --Reddy caste . Also happens to be son of LokAyukta Judge Shri B. Subhashan Reddy . Another example of dynastic succession. Justice R. Subhash Reddy , Supreme Court Judge is reported to be the brother-in-law of Late B. Subhashan Reddy.

  18. All the four are advocates. They are not promotees from District Judiciaries.

  19. In the appointment of Judges to High Courts of other States also, a similar situation may be prevailing. In every State of India, we may find two or three dominant LANDED CASTES.

  20. Advocates of landed castes can endure the hardships of eking out livelihood as Lawyers easily, because they have untaxed agricultural sources of income. Besides, they can use their surpluses from Agriculture in other businesses, investment avenues such as Share Markets, using their spare time, when Courts do not function or when cases get adjourned .

  21. Lawyers from Landed castes tend to get more and richer clients and Corporates.

  22. Though, occasionally , there may be 'rags-to-riches' stories of 1st generation entrepreneurs , normally landlords of fertile / irrigated districts tend to start agrobased and other industries, Hotels, Private Colleges under Reimbursement Schemes, Hospitals under Government Schemes and get transformed into industrialists. Hence, there will be synergic relationships between landlords, industrialists, and landed-caste-lawyers.

  23. Most people belonging to poor and Lower Middle classes do not have capabilities to approach High Courts and Supreme Court , because poorer Sections of Society do not have the moolah to pay the various types of fees of Landed Caste Lawyers. Hence, Landlords and Industrialists, Corporate clients approach Landlord lawyers for filing petitions and appeals in High Courts and Supreme Court.

  24. To continue. Subject to corrections of facts and views.

  25. References

    1. http://problemsoftelugus.blogspot.com/search/label/754
    2. http://problemsoftelugus.blogspot.com/search/label/737
    3. http://problemsoftelugus.blogspot.com/search/label/587
    4. http://problemsoftelugus.blogspot.com/search/label/871

go to top

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9 Prevention of Miscarriages

Image
Prevention of Miscarriages 9 High Courts and Supreme Courts ought to aim to prevent injustice. What is the use of post mortem? Topics for discussion: Miscarriage of Justice, High Courts, Supreme Court, Constitution, A.P. Bifurcation With due respect to the Supreme Court of India and the State High Courts in India, I am anguished to express my feelings as under: Supreme Court and High Courts seem inclined to intervene only after an injustice takes place and refuse to intervene if the petitioners approach in advance. Prevention of injustice, rather than some artificial correction after miscarriage of justice, ought to be the objective of a truly responsive Justice System. Philosophy of Justice expects that courts have to intervene, when applicants approach ahead of the actual happening of injustice, if there are indications of the injustice taking place, prima facie. Andhra Pradesh Bifurcation Bill serves as the best example of miscarriage of justice owing to refusal of High ...
Read more

011 Justice should not only be done, but also should appear to have been done!

Image
Photos courtesy http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/judges/sjud/hldattu.htm    http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/judges/sjud/kjoseph.htm Readers can also see the biodata of the Hon. Justices at the above links. Context This is in continuation of my post No. 010 at this blog:  http://indianlawyb.blogspot.in/search/label/010 Hon. Justice Joseph expressed his inability to attend a dinner-cum-Conference of CMs and Justices hosted by Prime Minister of India, as it was held on Easter Day. Justice Joseph has also raised some pertinent questions about future of Secularism in India, and also the particular act of holding the Conference on a day of Religious Importance. "...I may with deep anguish bring to your kind notice that such an important conference shouldn't have been held when some of us, who are otherwise expected to be part of the event, are otherwise committed on account of the holy days when we have religious ceremonies and family get- toge...
Read more

004 Why should Junior Advocates be made scapegoats?

Image
WHY BLAME A JUNIOR ADVOCATE? NEWS HEADLINE : "SC PULLS UP MAHINDRA SATYAM FOR 'ARROGANCE' " The SC here refers to the Supreme Court of India. Pulling up refers to the Supreme Court censuring the Company "Mahindra Satyam". Brief Details : A dispute between the Company 'Mahindra Satyam' and the Income Tax Authorities regarding the earlier order of the Income Tax Department demanding a tax of Rupees 6170 million (617 crore). The Income Tax Authorities seem to be re-examining their demand of Rs. 6170 million and probably trying to reduce it. A letter addressed by the Company to the Income Tax Authorities asking them to withdraw their demand, has been interprted by the Attorney General Mr. G.E. Vahanavati as highly offensive. A three-judge-bench headed by the Chief Justice of India remarked : "You cannot do this in such manner. Instruct them (Satyam) to withdraw the letter. This is not the way." The Bench seems to...
Read more