006 Objective Type Multiple Choice Questions Test on Indian Law


.













Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

016 -200 Snippets of Text Expansion and Auto-Completion

Image
The following are 200 snippets prepared by me , while studying a judgement of Supreme Court of INdia, relating to denomination Indian Currency Notes, made in 2016 November. In 2023, the Supreme Court came out with a judgement, upholding the 2016 Demonetization , with 4:1 majority. Leaving aside the foremost issue of examining the circumstances which have led to sufferings of millions of people, the judgement seems to have ignored "people's sufferings" as if demonetisation was necessary to save the country. In Telugu language, my mother tongue, there is a proverb : "inTlO elukalu unnAyani, okaDu illu tagala peTTukunnADuta". Approximate English gist, to the best of my ability: A person, having come to know that there are rats in the house, so as to get rid of them, set his home on fire. Most rats escaped through holes in the house, and rat-holes in the ground. The fire spread over the entire village, razing down almost all the houses. Many petitions we...
Read more

014 Independence of Indian Courts and Judges appear to be at peril owing to Temptations before Judges

Image
TODAY'S untrivia: THE TELUGU PROVERB 'KUNJARA YUDHAMBU DOMA KUTTUKA JOCCEN', approx. Engl. equivalent 'A herd of Elephants entered into the throat of a mosquito', seems to apply to Retd. Supreme Court CJI. Recommendation of 1st Law Commission, 14th Report, as explained by Late M.C. Setalvad, one of Constitution Drafters, 1st Attorney General , Chairman 1st Law Commission, 1st Chairman, Bar Council of India: '....The Commission had, after careful consideration expressed the unanimous view that the practice of Judges looking forward to or accepting employment under the Government after retirement was undesirable as it could affect the independence of the Judiciary. We therefore recommended that a constitutional bar should be imposed on Judges accepting office under the Union or State Governments similar to the bar in the case of the Auditor and Comptroller-General and members of Public Service Commissions. ...' [ybmad contg.:] On advice of GOVERNMENT ...
Read more

004 Why should Junior Advocates be made scapegoats?

Image
WHY BLAME A JUNIOR ADVOCATE? NEWS HEADLINE : "SC PULLS UP MAHINDRA SATYAM FOR 'ARROGANCE' " The SC here refers to the Supreme Court of India. Pulling up refers to the Supreme Court censuring the Company "Mahindra Satyam". Brief Details : A dispute between the Company 'Mahindra Satyam' and the Income Tax Authorities regarding the earlier order of the Income Tax Department demanding a tax of Rupees 6170 million (617 crore). The Income Tax Authorities seem to be re-examining their demand of Rs. 6170 million and probably trying to reduce it. A letter addressed by the Company to the Income Tax Authorities asking them to withdraw their demand, has been interprted by the Attorney General Mr. G.E. Vahanavati as highly offensive. A three-judge-bench headed by the Chief Justice of India remarked : "You cannot do this in such manner. Instruct them (Satyam) to withdraw the letter. This is not the way." The Bench seems to...
Read more